<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s Bing.com Search Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saadkamal.com/microsoft/bing-search-engine-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saadkamal.com/microsoft/bing-search-engine-review/</link>
	<description>Search Marketing for Small Business &#38; Bloggers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bing Tech</title>
		<link>http://www.saadkamal.com/microsoft/bing-search-engine-review/comment-page-1/#comment-6060</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saadkamal.com/?p=1329#comment-6060</guid>
		<description>The only problem with their (Bing / Microsoft / Yahoo) malware detection is that it falsely detects certain threats, and then assigns the dangerous link status with no recourse for the target website, other than a 3 week wait for them to review. We have a website that is listed as containing malware by Bing (and on Yahoo), yet multiple scans by Google malware and other 3rd party scans reveal nothing!  3 separate emails to Bing technical support asking for the source of the problem, or even a valid link to their partner &quot;NevelSoft&quot; which they point to as one of their sources of scanning, all resulted in polite but idiotic emails explaining that it will take 2-3 weeks .. .or more, to re-evaluate the site. The worst part is, because they will not or cannot reveal what the problem is, there is no guarantee that this insane cycle of non-support will not continue to loop.

Example of actual &quot;tech support response&quot; from bing:

Hi XXXX, 

This is again Jerome with Bing Technical Support.  Thank you for writing again.

We regret that we cannot provide more information regarding your inquiry and take immediate action regarding the malware warning that is appearing on our SERP when searching for your site.  It is for these reasons why your case was forwarded to our product group.

For more information regarding why Bing flags sites as potentially harmful, please visit http://onlinehelp.microsoft.com/en-us/bing/ff808537.aspx  

We will contact you as soon as developments come in from our product group.

Sincerely,

Jerome

Bing Technical Support

Of course it is Microsoft so no legal resolution exists.... Everyone should know that while it may be nice to attempt to protect your customers against malware, you should provide a mechanism to allow a website owner to remedy the problem (if in fact one exists) in a timely manner. This costs real people real money.
.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;6060&#039;,&#039;Bing Tech&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply to this comment&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem with their (Bing / Microsoft / Yahoo) malware detection is that it falsely detects certain threats, and then assigns the dangerous link status with no recourse for the target website, other than a 3 week wait for them to review. We have a website that is listed as containing malware by Bing (and on Yahoo), yet multiple scans by Google malware and other 3rd party scans reveal nothing!  3 separate emails to Bing technical support asking for the source of the problem, or even a valid link to their partner &#8220;NevelSoft&#8221; which they point to as one of their sources of scanning, all resulted in polite but idiotic emails explaining that it will take 2-3 weeks .. .or more, to re-evaluate the site. The worst part is, because they will not or cannot reveal what the problem is, there is no guarantee that this insane cycle of non-support will not continue to loop.</p>
<p>Example of actual &#8220;tech support response&#8221; from bing:</p>
<p>Hi XXXX, </p>
<p>This is again Jerome with Bing Technical Support.  Thank you for writing again.</p>
<p>We regret that we cannot provide more information regarding your inquiry and take immediate action regarding the malware warning that is appearing on our SERP when searching for your site.  It is for these reasons why your case was forwarded to our product group.</p>
<p>For more information regarding why Bing flags sites as potentially harmful, please visit <a href="http://onlinehelp.microsoft.com/en-us/bing/ff808537.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://onlinehelp.microsoft.com/en-us/bing/ff808537.aspx</a>  </p>
<p>We will contact you as soon as developments come in from our product group.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Jerome</p>
<p>Bing Technical Support</p>
<p>Of course it is Microsoft so no legal resolution exists&#8230;. Everyone should know that while it may be nice to attempt to protect your customers against malware, you should provide a mechanism to allow a website owner to remedy the problem (if in fact one exists) in a timely manner. This costs real people real money.<br />
.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('6060','Bing Tech'); return false;">Reply to this comment</a> </div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bing Tech</title>
		<link>http://www.saadkamal.com/microsoft/bing-search-engine-review/comment-page-1/#comment-6059</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saadkamal.com/?p=1329#comment-6059</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg,

 

This is again Jerome with Bing Technical Support.  Thank you for writing again.

 

We regret that we cannot provide more information regarding your inquiry and take immediate action regarding the malware warning that is appearing on our SERP when searching for your site.  It is for these reasons why your case was forwarded to our product group.

 

For more information regarding why Bing flags sites as potentially harmful, please visit http://onlinehelp.microsoft.com/en-us/bing/ff808537.aspx  

 

We will contact you as soon as developments come in from our product group.

 

Sincerely,

 

Jerome

Bing Technical Support&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;6059&#039;,&#039;Bing Tech&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply to this comment&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg,</p>
<p>This is again Jerome with Bing Technical Support.  Thank you for writing again.</p>
<p>We regret that we cannot provide more information regarding your inquiry and take immediate action regarding the malware warning that is appearing on our SERP when searching for your site.  It is for these reasons why your case was forwarded to our product group.</p>
<p>For more information regarding why Bing flags sites as potentially harmful, please visit <a href="http://onlinehelp.microsoft.com/en-us/bing/ff808537.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://onlinehelp.microsoft.com/en-us/bing/ff808537.aspx</a>  </p>
<p>We will contact you as soon as developments come in from our product group.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Jerome</p>
<p>Bing Technical Support
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('6059','Bing Tech'); return false;">Reply to this comment</a> </div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo New Homepage - More Personalized</title>
		<link>http://www.saadkamal.com/microsoft/bing-search-engine-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1433</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo New Homepage - More Personalized</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saadkamal.com/?p=1329#comment-1433</guid>
		<description>[...] In fact in many cases, when Google failed to give what I was looking for, Yahoo saved me! Now that Bing.com is here, Yahoo&#8217;s chances in Search is almost gone - unless they agree to merge with Microsoft. [...]&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;1433&#039;,&#039;Yahoo New Homepage - More Personalized&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply to this comment&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In fact in many cases, when Google failed to give what I was looking for, Yahoo saved me! Now that Bing.com is here, Yahoo&#8217;s chances in Search is almost gone &#8211; unless they agree to merge with Microsoft. [...]
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1433','Yahoo New Homepage - More Personalized'); return false;">Reply to this comment</a> </div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bing Webmaster Center</title>
		<link>http://www.saadkamal.com/microsoft/bing-search-engine-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1183</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing Webmaster Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 07:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saadkamal.com/?p=1329#comment-1183</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote a review about Bing and how this new search engine from Microsoft really impressed [...]&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;1183&#039;,&#039;Bing Webmaster Center&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply to this comment&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote a review about Bing and how this new search engine from Microsoft really impressed [...]
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1183','Bing Webmaster Center'); return false;">Reply to this comment</a> </div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bing.com Search Engine Review</title>
		<link>http://www.saadkamal.com/microsoft/bing-search-engine-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing.com Search Engine Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 20:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saadkamal.com/?p=1329#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>[...] post by Saad aggregated by [...]&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;1182&#039;,&#039;Bing.com Search Engine Review&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply to this comment&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post by Saad aggregated by [...]
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1182','Bing.com Search Engine Review'); return false;">Reply to this comment</a> </div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bing.com Search Engine Review &#124; Bid Ant Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.saadkamal.com/microsoft/bing-search-engine-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1181</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing.com Search Engine Review &#124; Bid Ant Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 19:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saadkamal.com/?p=1329#comment-1181</guid>
		<description>[...] More here: Bing.com Search Engine Review [...]&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;1181&#039;,&#039;Bing.com Search Engine Review &#124; Bid Ant Blog&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply to this comment&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More here: Bing.com Search Engine Review [...]
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1181','Bing.com Search Engine Review | Bid Ant Blog'); return false;">Reply to this comment</a> </div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

